We publish typefaces, reviews, and things we think one ought to see.
Isn't that swell.
Oh, and we don't use IMGs.

French Canon: Where Hath All My Balls Gone?

&
&
Q
Q
The Fell Types were revived and digitized in 2000.
…T?
PETER DE
WALPERGEN’S ORIGINAL CUT OF FRENCH CANON IS VERY SIMILAR TO ITS WEBFONT COUNTERPART,
but some differences are notable.
Two characters that still bear De Walpergen’s flamboyant ball terminals are the italic cap ‘Q’ and the italic ‘&’.
BUT OTHER CHARACTERS BEAR CASUALTIES OF CONVERSION
&
The original cap ‘T’ had extravagantly curled ball terminals on either end of the crossbar, whereas the default ‘T’ in the web version is dry and conventional.
Though French Canon for web has lost a few of its more exuberant details, it is more flexible in terms of scale.
Don’t worry, the family still contains its original inconsistencies of axis.
(especially the lowercase ‘a’)
ar
“Technical imperfection is undoubtedly part of the character of ‘Fell’ in print. The pieces of type differ in height to an extent that horrifies a type-founder and tries the patience of a machine manager; their faces are not horizontal, many are not struck at the correct angle with the vertical. By employing modern techniques it would be possible to put these things right, but so far nobody dares propose it; too much of the evident difference between Fell and other types would be lost.”

Harry Carter,
Oxford University Press,
New York, 1968.

…read more

The Fell Types, a font family that includes French Canon, were named after John Fell, who collected type for the University of Oxford in the 1660s. During this time, the type used in England was predominantly Dutch so, in addition to importing type, Fell sought to develop something original. Famously, he believed that, “[in] philosophy, philology, classical texts and Christian documents: the knowledge and the criticism lived on printed pages” (Marini). The Fell Types were created when Fell created his own workhouse and hired Peter De Walpergen (not surprisingly, a Dutchman) to be his type-founder.

The web version of De Walpergen’s cut still bears his original crudities — mainly inconsistencies in height and axis — that were later responsible for what Harry Carter touted as “unmistakable Oxford flavour.” The texture of its longform is unique and most either hate it or love it. Counters and apertures vary greatly (tiny in the two story ‘g’ but spacious in the ‘v’ and the ‘d’), which makes the type seem either to stumble or dance, depending on your persuasion. Regardless, whether the typeface appears vulgar or rich, it can be agreed that French Canon tends to make an awkward first impression. And this is perhaps why it deserves a bit of attention.

In a design world controlled largely by cursor and Bézier, the demands on type are far different than what they used to be. Rather than carving punches, type designers create perfect curves with the click of a mouse or a bit of code. Type is malleable. It might stand taller than a man or hover in the space of a few pixels, and these are all demands that did not exist in the age of punch and matrix.

Igino Marini breathed life into French Canon’s onscreen existence. He designed it in accordance with most web type revivals—a process that involves the repurposing of a static character (cut and molded to exist at a very specific size) into something utterly elastic and somewhat intangible. Not only that, the character is then optimized to adhere to a grid of pixels.

For the sake of both utility and form, several changes were made to the digital version of French Canon. One instance involves removal of the aforementioned ball terminals on the default italic capital ‘T’ which, when scaled down, dissolve into a pixel blotch. But besides this, Marini’s web version still feels hand-cut, which is noticeable in the dramatized outline of the italic ampersand.

Other irregularities were preserved as well. The typeface appears most conventional when set in regular uppercase — at least then axes are consistent in grade. Regular miniscule, however, begins showing signs of abnormality. One look at the two-story ‘a’ and you wonder if De Walpergen was having a laugh. Its spine, angled several degrees more to the right, makes it appear to be cocking it’s hip. And if regular seems a bit campy, the italic becomes comical, especially in uppercase. The skew of characters like ‘A’, ‘V’ and ‘W’ will have you asking, “Who ate a slice of pizza from my text block?”

The numbers also bear mentioning, for though they are congruent with the original cut, they come off as strange. Numerals 1-9 are lively and calligraphic, the zero however, is the only character in the entire set with no contrast. My first thought was to check for syntax errors. My second was simply, “WHY??” This geometric sore-thumb actually aligns itself with a classic tradition in oldstyle figures. Similar zeroes, also found in both Garamond and Caslon, were used to differentiate the zero from the miniscule ‘o’. These strange zeroes now exist on web as an homage to metal type. While readers can easily use context to discern a number from a letter, distributors of metal type did not have this luxury—thus, we are left with an anorexic cheerio.

The details go on and on, but we have reached the bottom line—French Canon wibbles and it wobbles. So why use it?

When confronted with web font databases like Typekit, users are often left with a feeling similar to the kind that occurs in supermarkets. The choices are overwhelming. Psychologist Barry Schwartz (“The Paradox of Choice”) refers to this as paralysis. There is no denying that choosing type is fun, but this sort of fun disintegrates three hours later when it’s gotten dark and nothing has been designed.

Ultimately, French Canon gets attention of this article because it soothes this paralysis. On a shelf of many typefaces, it stands out just enough—a pleasant departure from the usual horde of perfect serifs. While it comes off as funky, its flaws are consistent with the face’s historical engraving. Not only that, it stands out; its impurities give it character, validated by its history. If Futura was meant to aesthetically mimic modernist ideology, French Canon is perhaps a mimesis of ‘the handmade’—it is calligraphic and the curves of each character are humanistic and hand-cut.

Despite all its curiosities, the face has utility. French Canon reads well in longform, and its italics make for lively display. It can be used in place of many other ubiquitous serifs, and its capricious characteristics—while considered sloppy by some—make it utterly memorable.

SOURCES
1
2

5 comments to French Canon: Where Hath All My Balls Gone?

  • Here is my blog post … site [Tory]

  • This post is very interesting, but is hard to find in search
    engine. I found it on 15 spot. You can reach google top10 easily using one handy wordpress plugin and increase targeted traffic many
    times. Just search in google for:
    Akalatoru’s Rank Plugin

  • What’s up to all, it’s really a nice for me too visit this website, it consists
    of helpful Information.

  • Hi I am so happy I found your web site, I really foound you by mistake,
    while I was researching on Bing for something else, Nonetheless I
    am here now and would just like to say cheers for a incredible
    post and a all round enjoyable blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to read through it all at
    the moment but I have book-marked it and also included your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read much more,
    Please do kerp up the fantastic work.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>